Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carlos Gimeno Valero vs Kenny De Schepper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Valero vs Schepper analysis and find out who is favored!
Carlos Gimeno Valero vs Kenny De Schepper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Valero 0 - 0 Schepper
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Valero has won 40.42% of points on their second serve, while Schepper has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Valero, in recent form, has won 59.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schepper has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.68% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Valero has saved 57.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schepper has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Valero has won 68.75% of matches played (W/L 44/ 20), with Schepper winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Valero has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Schepper has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Valero has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.85% of matches (W/L 42/ 19), where as Schepper has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Valero has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.48 while Schepper has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Valero has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schepper has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Valero has converted 55.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schepper has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
37
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carlos Gimeno Valero | Kenny De Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (22/7) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (47/22) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (341/258) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 76% (22/7) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 14 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.62 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 180 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:20 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.1 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1371/2039) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (855/1371) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (270/668) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (153/276) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (1006/1988) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 77% (20/6) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (20/25) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 56% (9/5) | 1st Match |
Carlos Gimeno Valero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Carlos Gimeno Valero
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jaime Caldes
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Carlos Gimeno Valero
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
45 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
60 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Roger Pascual Ferra
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milan Markovits
Player
Carlos Gimeno Valero
56%
(
63 of
113)
1st Serve %
83%
(
77 of
93)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
54 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Carlos Gimeno Valero
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Lorenzo Rottoli
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Mark Whitehouse
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Kenny De Schepper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Kenny de Schepper
66%
(
73 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
51 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Kenny de Schepper
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Pedro Andre De Almeida Santos
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-0 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Kenny de Schepper
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Luc Fomba
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Matthew Hulme
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Weber
Player
Kenny de Schepper
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Valero Vs Schepper Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Valero are available here and Schepper photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
